Taylor Swift's lawyers clap back at Las Vegas performer's Life of a Showgirl lawsuit: ‘Should never have been filed’

DId joseph deems taylor gustavus franklin swift’s The life-time of a Showgirl rip off the spot from the life of a real one? The 36-year-old pop star’s attorneys have now fired back at an ongoing lawsuit filed by cabaret performer Maren Flagg, who accused her of violating copyright and trademark laws over the phrase “Confessions of a Showgirl.” Swift’s legal team has dismissed the claims outright, calling the suggestion that consumers could confuse the services offered by the two women “absurd.”Also Read | Sequins, spectacle, and survival: What is the inspiration behind Taylor Swift’s The Life of a Showgirl?Inside the ongoing lawsuitAccording to AP News, Flagg filed a trademark infringement lawsuit on March 30 in United States District Court in California, alleging that Taylor Swift’s October 2025 album “The Life of a Showgirl” infringes on her 2015 trademark for the phrase “Confessions of a Showgirl.” Flagg claimed she had built her brand around the title over the years, using it for her newspaper column, podcast, and cabaret performances.Maren Flagg, who goes by Maren Wade on stage, first used the phrase for a column on backstage life in Sin City that she began writing for the Las Vegas Weekly in 2014, before later turning it into a live cabaret show that went on a national tour. In the lawsuit, Flagg argued that the two titles are strikingly similar, stating, “Both share the same structure, the same dominant phrase, and the same overall commercial impression. Both are used in overlapping markets and are directed at the same consumers.”Taylor Swift’s lawyers clap backAfter Flagg sought an immediate injunction to block Taylor Swift from selling related merchandise while the two battle it out in court, the Blank Space hitmaker’s legal team reportedly hit back “aggressively” in a brief filed on May 6, according to Page Six. The filing, cited by Variety, argued that the motion “should never have been filed,” much like Flagg’s lawsuit itself, accusing the performer of attempting to use Swift’s name and intellectual property to further promote her own brand.The filing states, “Plaintiff attempts to broadly lump her cabaret show and defendants’ musical album together as ‘entertainment services.’ That comparison is absurd,” as Swift’s lawyers pushed back against the claims. The legal team further argued that there was virtually no possibility of consumer confusion between Swift’s record-breaking stadium tour and the plaintiff’s cabaret performances, which they said take place, “if at all,” in “small intimate venues,” including a “55+ active community,” “55+ golf resort,” “RV & Golf Resort,” a “90 seat cabaret-style venue” offering dinner service, hotels, and private supper clubs. They also noted, “Her website lists no upcoming performances.”Moreover, the defence team also urged the judge to consider why the cabaret performer was seeking immediate relief over alleged “irreparable harm” nearly eight months after the album was first announced. Taylor Swift’s lawyers argued that, during that time, Maren Flagg had instead reshaped her own branding around the album, allegedly flooding social media with posts attempting to associate herself with Swift and “The Life of a Showgirl”. Despite the sharp rebuttal, Flagg and her attorneys have chosen to press ahead with the lawsuit, saying they look forward to filing their response the following week.