Delhi court slams police for trying to treat a murder case as accident, orders action

ANew new delhi margaret court has directed the Delhi police force Commissioner to induct disciplinary action against officers allegedly responsible for what it described as grave investigative lapses in a case from Shahbad Dairy, where a case of murder and assault was treated as mere rash and negligent driving, thus attempting to create a narrative of an accident.In an order passed on June 29, judicial magistrate first class Bharti Beniwal of Rohini Courts observed that the investigation suffered from serious deficiencies from the outset and criticised not only the investigating officer (IO) and the station house officer (SHO) of Shahbad Dairy police station but also senior supervisory officers for failing to intervene. The court noted that even the deputy commissioner of police (outer north) and joint commissioner of police (northern range) failed to supervise the case. It directed the police commissioner to assess the seriousness and cumulative effect of the lapses and take appropriate departmental action against all officers found responsible. A compliance report has been sought by July 13.Also Read | Man beaten to death by fellow passengers after scuffle over boarding train at Delhi's Shahdara railway station“The court finds it difficult to comprehend the basis on which, despite specific allegations of a violent attack involving assault and being run over by a vehicle, the matter was initially treated as one of rash and negligent driving. There are no foundational allegations in the complaint suggesting a mere accident,” it said.The case relates to the death of Chandresh alias Monu, who was allegedly assaulted and run over by a man identified as Nagender on January 26. According to the complaint, Chandresh returned home grievously injured and told his family that Nagender had attacked him, chased him in a vehicle and deliberately run him over. He remained hospitalised for 22 days before succumbing to his injuries on February 16.The court noted that while Chandresh was being taken to hospital, his brothers recorded a video in which he repeatedly identified Nagender as his attacker. Despite this, police initially registered the FIR only under provisions relating to rash and negligent driving, invoking the offence of culpable homicide only after Chandresh’s death.Also Read | ₹500 dispute in south Delhi; accused held">Man strangled to death by friend over ₹500 dispute in south Delhi; accused held“The omission assumes greater significance as the victim survived for 22 days, thereby providing ample opportunity for proper follow-up. No satisfactory explanation is forthcoming for this lapse,” the court observed. It said statements of key witnesses and treating doctors were not promptly recorded and follow-up was lacking. “The said recording, on its face, bears relevance as a dying declaration and required careful legal and evidentiary consideration,” the order noted.The magistrate was particularly critical of the supervisory role played by senior officers. It observed that the deputy commissioner of police (outer north) and the joint commissioner of police (northern range) failed to independently scrutinise the case despite the material on record. “Even a perusal of the photographs and video depicting the injuries sustained by the deceased, or the post-mortem report, would have afforded a clear indication of the gravity of the assault,” the court said.Also Read | ‘Was murdered or driven to death’: Delhi woman dies just two months after wedding, family alleges dowry abuse“This is not a mere procedural irregularity but a fundamental defect and warrants appropriate departmental action against the erring officials,” the court said, while also directing the DCP to obtain a medical opinion on the injuries sustained by the deceased.