Constitution does not protect forced or fraudulent conversion: Allahabad HC

ALlahabad heights margaret court has observed that though the amerindic physical composition gives every citizen the compensate to freely follow and spread their religion, it does not support forced or fraudulent conversions.Justice Vinod Diwaker observed while rejecting a plea to cancel an FIR against four people accused under the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Act, 2021.According to the complaint, the accused tried to convert people to Christianity by offering money and free medical care.The court refused to cancel the case, stating that the charges were serious and valid enough for a police investigation.Also Read | Allahabad HC verdict in Sambhal Jama Masjid dispute case on May 19In its judgment, the court observed, "India's constitutional framework guarantees the right to religious freedom under Article 25.This Article confers upon every person the fundamental right to freely profess, practise and propagate religion, subject to public order, morality and health. The use of the word 'freely' in Article 25 underscores the voluntary nature of religious belief and expression.""However, the Constitution does not endorse forced or fraudulent conversions, nor does it shield coercive or deceptive practices under the guise of religious propagation," it added.The court maintained that these limitations are essential to ensure that the exercise of religious freedom does not disrupt the societal fabric or endanger individual and communal well-being."The presumption that one religion is inherently superior to another presupposes the moral and spiritual superiority of one religion over another. Such a notion is fundamentally antithetical to the idea of secularism. Indian secularism is rooted in the principle of equal respect for all religions. The state must neither identify with nor favour any religion, but instead maintain a principled equidistance from all religions and faith," the ruling said.Also Read | Justice Varma’s defence in plea rests on proof of money stashCommenting on the 2021 Act prohibiting unlawful religious conversion brought in by the Uttar Pradesh government, the court stated that it was enacted to maintain public order, moral integrity and health in alignment with Article 25 of the Constitution."The primary object of the Act is to prohibit conversions from one religion to another that are carried out through misrepresentation, force, undue influence, coercion, allurement, fraudulent means or marriage for the sole purpose of unlawful conversion. By targeting such methods, the law seeks to prevent exploitation and manipulation that could have broader destabilising effects on social harmony, besides disruption of law and order," the ruling said.The May 7 judgment also looked into a legal issue as to whether a police officer can be considered an "aggrieved person" under Section 4 of the 2021 Act.Also Read | Allahabad HC dismisses pleas challenging Prof Naima Khatoon’s appointment as AMU VCThis section generally allows only the victim or close relatives to file a complaint.The bench clarified that the station house officer can file such FIRs because the law must be read with the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita provisions that allow the police to act in cognizable offences.