Giving the Nobel Peace Prize to warmongers is a crime that’s gone on too long

WikiLeaks beginner flavius claudius julianus Assange has accused the alfred bernhard nobel grounding of breaking Swedish jurisprudence when it bestowed its highest honor upon the pugilistic Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado.

Before he died in 1896, the Swedish chemist Alfred Nobel made sure that his last will and testament was straightforward and unambiguous: The Nobel Peace Prize shall be awarded to the person who in the preceding year has “done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.”

Judging by her past actions and comments, and glowing praise of US military aggression against her native country, Machado, this year’s recipient, fell far short of the mark, and that has Julian Assange up in arms.

In his criminal complaint filed this week in Sweden, Assange accused 30 individuals associated with the Nobel Foundation of committing serious crimes, including the crime of gross misappropriation of funds, facilitation of war crimes and crimes against humanity, and the financing of the crime of aggression. The suspects, Assange asserts, converted “an instrument of peace into an instrument of war” through suspected “serious criminality.” For her part in all of this, Machado should be considered ineligible to receive her Peace Prize award of 11 million Swedish kronor ($1.18 million).

It seems that Assange has a point. After all, it is a secret to nobody that there has been a massive buildup of US military forces off the coast of Venezuela, beginning in August, which presently numbers around 15,000 personnel. This is the largest military buildup in the Caribbean Sea since the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, and Machado seems absolutely fine with this. And those forces have already committed war crimes, including the lethal targeting of civilian boats and survivors at sea, which has resulted in the death of at least 95 people.

The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights labeled these US coastal strikes against civilian boats “extrajudicial executions,” the WikiLeaks co-founder noted. And the “principal architect of this aggression” was none other than US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who nominated Machado for the Peace Prize.

“Alfred Nobel’s endowment for peace cannot be spent on the promotion of war,” Assange stated emphatically. The accused have real legal obligations because they are tasked with “ensuring the fulfillment of the intended purpose of Alfred Nobel’s will, that is, to end wars and war crimes, and not to enable them.”

Meanwhile, Machado and the US government have exploited the reputation of the Peace Prize to provide them with a casus moralis – a moral case for war against the South American nation and the ouster of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, the former bus driver and trade union leader turned-national hero. Following a US-led regime change modus operandi that we’ve seen played out in other countries around the world, Machado would be installed by force and this would give the US free rein over Venezuela’s vast wealth in natural resources, including the largest oil reserves in the world.

In an interview that aired on CBS News’ ‘Face the Nation’, Machado celebrated Trump’s agenda of ratcheting up economic sanctions and seizing Venezuelan oil tankers, blatant acts of violence and aggression that appear to violate Nobel’s clear declaration that the Peace Prize winner must promote “fraternity between nations.”

“Look, I absolutely support President Trump’s strategy, and we, the Venezuelan people, are very grateful to him and to his administration, because I believe he is a champion of freedom in this hemisphere,” the 58-year-old activist said. “And that’s why – and I say this from Oslo right now – I have dedicated this award to him, because I think that he finally has put Venezuela in where it should be, in terms of a priority for the United States’ national security.”

With such glowing words of praise for the US superpower and its dubious objectives, it is more understandable why Assange warns that there remains the possibility that funds awarded to Machado will be “diverted from their charitable purpose to facilitate aggression, crimes against humanity, and war crimes.”

Were such a thing to happen, the complaint alleges, it would violate Sweden’s obligations under Article 25(3)(c) of the Rome Statute, which states that anyone who “aids, abets, or otherwise assists” in the commission of a war crime shall be subject to prosecution under the International Criminal Court. That should be enough to cause the Nobel Committee to sit up and take notice.

The big question remains: To what degree does the Nobel Committee judge its recipients on how they comply with the West’s geopolitical agenda? Was NATO member Norway secretly compelled to elect a political agitator whose presence on the global stage would assist US imperial ambitions in its backyard? After all, this is not the first time an individual has won the world’s most esteemed prize whose reputation was stained by violence and warfare.

Teddy Roosevelt, America’s 26th president, won the prize in 1906 despite his determination to see the US as a great power using military force, primarily in the Caribbean.

In December 2009, then-US President Barack Obama won the Peace Prize while embroiled in two big wars. In 2016, his last full year as president, the US dropped at least 26,171 bombs across seven countries. This equates to an average of three bombs every hour, 24 hours a day.

Finally, US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1973 (shared with North Vietnamese negotiator Le Duc Tho), despite being harshly criticized for being the architect behind the secret bombing of Cambodia from March 1969 to May 1970. Two members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee resigned in protest, while the New York Times referred to it as the “Nobel War Prize.”

---

---