EU, France condemn U.S. visa ban targeting former EU commissioner, activists

The ruff governance on tues imposed visa bans on a former European unification commissioner and anti-disinformation campaigners it says were mired in censoring U.S. Social media platforms, the latest move in a campaign aimed at European rules that U.S. Officials say go beyond legitimate regulation.

Trump officials have ordered U.S. Diplomats to build opposition to the European Union's landmark Digital Services Act (DSA), which is intended to combat hateful speech, misinformation and disinformation, but which Washington says stifles free speech and imposes costs on U.S. Tech companies.

The visa bans come after the administration's National Security Strategy this month said European leaders were censoring free speech and suppressing opposition to immigration policies that it said risk "civilizational erasure" for the continent.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the five people targeted with visa bans "have led organized efforts to coerce American platforms to censor, demonetize and suppress American viewpoints they oppose."

"These radical activists and weaponized NGOs have advanced censorship crackdowns by foreign states — in each case targeting American speakers and American companies," Rubio said in an announcement.

Rubio did not name those targeted, but Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy Sarah Rogers identified them on X, accusing the individuals of "fomenting censorship of American speech."

The most high-profile target was French former business executive Thierry Breton, who served as the European commissioner for the internal market from 2019-2024. Rogers called Breton "a mastermind" of the DSA and said he once threatened President Donald Trump's ally, X owner Elon Musk, ahead of an interview Musk conducted with Trump. Reuters was unable to immediately reach Breton for comment.

Reuters reported in August that U.S. officials were considering sanctions on officials responsible for the DSA.

French President Emmanuel Macron on Wednesday slammed the decision to bar the individuals.

"France condemns the visa restriction measures taken by the United States against Thierry Breton and four other European figures. These measures amount to intimidation and coercion aimed at undermining European digital sovereignty," Macron said on social media platform X.

"Together with the European Commission and our European partners, we will continue to defend our digital sovereignty and our regulatory autonomy," he added.

The European Commission similarly condemned the move, a Commission spokesperson said on Wednesday, adding that the EU had requested clarifications from the U.S. Authorities.

"If needed, we will respond swiftly and decisively to defend our regulatory autonomy against unjustified measures," he also said.

The visa bans also hit Imran Ahmed, the British CEO of the U.S.-based Center for Countering Digital Hate; Anna-Lena von Hodenberg and Josephine Ballon of the German nonprofit HateAid; and Clare Melford, co-founder of the Global Disinformation Index (GDI), Rogers said.

Hodenberg and Ballon said in a statement the visa bans were an attempt to obstruct the enforcement of European law on U.S. Corporations operating in Europe. "We will not be intimidated by a government that uses accusations of censorship to silence those who stand up for human rights and freedom of expression," they said.

A spokesperson for GDI called the U.S. Action "immoral, unlawful and un-American" and "an authoritarian attack on free speech and an egregious act of government censorship."

Rogers said Melford falsely labeled online comments as hate speech or disinformation and used U.S. Taxpayers' money to "exhort censorship and blacklisting of American speech and press."

The Center for Countering Digital Hate did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Melford, a former management consultant and TV executive, said in a video posted online in 2024 that she co-founded the GDI "to try to break the business model of harmful online content" by reviewing online news websites to allow advertisers to "choose whether or not they want to fund content that is polarizing and divisive and harmful, or whether they want to steer their advertising back towards more quality journalism.”

---

---