RCMP applicants endured ‘improper and invasive’ medical exams for years, lawsuit alleges

< warm>WARNING: This clause describes allegations of sexual assault.

Class-action lawyers say 1,000 RCMP recruits and employees feature amount forward complaining about doctors performing “inappropriate and unnecessary” exams “many of which arose to the level of sexual assault, assault or battery."

Megan McPhee, the plaintiff’s lead lawyer, says the lawsuit, launched in 2019 and certified in 2021, originally focused on allegations of sexual assault by two RCMP doctors.

But after the story made headlines, hundreds of men and women levelled complaints about 26 doctors hired by the RCMP. 

During court proceedings, the RCMP has also had to produce an internal form they gave doctors mandating a checklist exam for all candidates as a final step before they were hired.

“It doesn't screen for occupational health,” she said. €œI have an incredibly hard time imagining … whether a male is circumcised or not has any application to the ability to perform the role as a police officer.” 

The case is headed to Federal Court in Toronto on Jan. 19, where McPhee will ask for compensation and a summary judgement to settle the multi-million dollar case without a full trial.

“The RCMP does not minimize the seriousness of the allegations involving former physicians,” wrote media relations officer Camille Boily-Lavoie.

Sylvie Corriveau, the representative plaintiff in the civil suit, says her assault happened in 1989 when she was 27 and had just moved from northern Ontario to Toronto to apply to become an RCMP civilian 911 dispatcher. The final step was a medical exam. She says she was terrified as the doctor began massaging her legs and conducted a vaginal and rectal exam.

Corriveau says it was completely inappropriate and believes the physician was acting for his own sexual gratification.

Ex-RCMP 911 operator alleges abuse by RCMP doctor

“He keeps telling me that he's got the last say, so I have to just go along with this, so I was just going through the motions. But the minute I got away from that office, I couldn't believe what I had been put through.”

Corriveau and other women complained at the time to the RCMP, to Toronto police and to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario , each of which investigated, but ultimately laid no charges.

Corriveau retired in 2020 after 36 years on the force. To this day she is dumbfounded as to why the Mounties even required such an invasive exam in the first place.

“Was it necessary for the job that I was going to be doing as a 911 operator? Absolutely not,” Corriveau said.

McPhee, her lawyer, argues the RCMP is liable for “systemic negligence.” 

She claims the force ignored numerous complaints about the exams and disregarded recommendations for better supervision and the suggestion that if gynecological exams were needed at all, they should be carried out by specialists.

“All of these things really combined to place applicants to the RCMP in a very vulnerable and very dangerous position,” McPhee said. €œReally it's a lack of oversight. It's a lack of policies. It's a lack of procedures. It's the lack of safeguards.”

Among the court documents is a 2018 review of the force’s medical examination policies conducted by Dr. Josée Pilon of the RCMP’s Occupational Health and Safety Branch. It concludes the medical examinations done on recruits between the 1980’s and early 2000’s “were done pursuant to policy and standard of care applicable at the time.” 

But the same review notes that the mandatory inspection of genitals, breasts and rectums was ultimately dropped as a requirement in 2006.

The RCMP also stressed that many employees didn’t have provincial health coverage prior to 2013, so RCMP doctors conducted these medical exams as part of general health care — not just for the purpose of screening new recruits.

Many complainants are men who were subjected to prostate exams as part of their job screening. But some women report having had rectal exams, too.

He was angry to learn from other colleagues that not all new recruits were subjected to the same invasive procedure.

He is upset that he hasn't gotten an answer from the RCMP about what medical purpose the prostate exam served.

In 2020, a retired Supreme Court Judge recommended that Canada compensate recruits who were mistreated by RCMP doctors.  

Michel Bastarache, in his final report administering a different class action on behalf of female employees of the RCMP, noted that many women came forward but couldn’t receive compensation because the alleged abuse occurred before they were officially hired.

“The stories that I was told about the sexual abuse that female applicants suffered at the hands of RCMP doctors were shocking,” Bastarache wrote.

“What was worse, was that it appears that the behaviour of these doctors was known to others in the RCMP," he wrote. 

"In my view, it is unjust to compensate some of the victims and not all of them. I therefore recommend that steps be taken by Canada to compensate those who were not eligible under this process.”

Dave Seglins is an investigative journalist whose recent work includes exposés on global ticket scalping, offshore tax avoidance and government surveillance. He covers a range of domestic and international issues, including rail safety, policing, government and corporate corruption.

---

---